![]() ![]() But if they don’t vote “no” early on, it is possible that one of the earlier numbers will receive a majority vote and be approved BEFORE the group gets to the number the member is waiting for.Īlthough not technically an amendment, fill in the blank is a good way to amend a motion when there are many options. Sometimes people are silent on the first choices, planning to vote for the number they personally prefer. The tricky part here is that each member should vote on each number. THE DANGER IN THE FILL IN THE BLANK APPROACH In other words, “filling in the blank” does not mean that the body has ultimately decided on that number, it merely defines the number for further discussion and decision-making. FILL IN THE BLANK AND THEN VOTE ON THE ISSUEĭebate continues on the motion, and then the board votes. No vote is taken on the $100,000 and $75,000 options. That the surplus land parcel be sold for not less than $150,000. No vote is taken on the remaining numbers.The first number to get a majority vote fills the blank.Each member votes on each number that is offered, “aye” or “no.”.(If the board were buying property, or giving the executive director a raise, it would be the lowest number.) If there is no obvious “least likely to pass” option, the choices are listed in the order they are made. ![]() In the case of selling a properly that would be the highest number. The chair starts with the number LEAST likely to pass.Then the chair takes the vote on each number to fill in the blank. The group holds a brief discussion period, with each member explaining, if they choose to, why they believe their choice is the best one. Members suggest a price that they think ought to be the minimum, which the secretary writes in order from highest to lowest, so the list looks like this: That the surplus land parcel be sold for not less than _. Others think that it is too high – given the current real estate situation, they’ll be lucky to get $75,000.Ī member of the board or the chair can suggest “that we create a blank.” If there is no objection, staff writes the motion on a white board like this: The staff has proposed a motion, “That the surplus land parcel be sold for not less than $100,000.” Some board members think that this is too low – the organization could easily get $200,000 for the parcel. Suppose that the board is planning to sell a surplus land parcel. The fill in the blank approach is very efficient. Robert’s Rules of Order offers an easy way to choose among multiple options. Y <- ame(column = x, stringsAsFactors = FALSE) # ame version of x for tidyr X <- c("A", x) # Ensure the first element is not blank If the data frame isn't grouped by ID, with the value to be filled down being at the top of each group, then you could try a windowing function in dplyr or data.table # A popular solutionįor(i in seq_along(x)) if(is.na(x)) x <- x Note that most of these solutions are for vectors, not data frames, so they don't check any ID column. The new fill() function in tidyr version 0.3.0., which works on ames. The other solutions are easily adapted to non-NA blanks. Zoo::na.locf, which introduces a package dependency, and although it handles many edge cases, requires that the 'blank' values are NA. The question asks for efficiency compared with a loop. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |